Correct answer
No; the marking does not permit changing for convenience.
No. The current catalogue uses M-2.4 to separate speed-change, weaving or specialised lanes in sections where lane changing should not be allowed. It does not grant general permission to cross for convenience or destination. Respect the boundary and applicable control; do not confuse it with an edge line or broken M-1.6 or M-1.7 markings. Identification should not rely solely on a line looking wider.
Practice more B licence questions
A 3-minute quick test with exam-style questions. Free, no signup.
All options
Yes, any intended destination allows crossing it.
No; the marking does not permit changing for convenience.
Yes, all continuous lines are guidance without restriction.
Editorial status: editorially approved. This status does not certify legal review. Report a correction
Keep studying
Related questions
- What does the white-and-red checkerboard marking at the start of an emergency braking area prohibit?
- An animal-drawn vehicle approaches a STOP with a continuous transverse stop line. May the animals pass the line before the required stop?
- If no road or part is specifically assigned to them and the right-hand shoulder is passable and sufficient, which of these vehicles must generally use it?
- This sign prohibits passage by vehicles that…
- Is maintaining an adequate safe following distance a valid recommendation for avoiding accidents involving motorcycles?
- On a two-way urban road where carriageway parking is permitted, beside which edge should you generally position your car?