Correct answer
Yes, and they are also committing an offence.
Yes. Refusal is a ground for immobilisation under Traffic Law article 104 and General Traffic Regulation article 25. Refusal of the legal requirement is covered by Criminal Code article 383. Obvious signs of drinking are not an additional requirement for this ground. Immobilisation ends when its cause ceases; replacement by another qualified driver is subject to legal conditions and officers’ assessment. Refusal alone does not prove a particular alcohol level.
Practice more B licence questions
A 3-minute quick test with exam-style questions. Free, no signup.
All options
Only if they show clear signs of having consumed alcohol.
No.
Yes, and they are also committing an offence.
Editorial status: editorially approved. This status does not certify legal review. Report a correction
Keep studying
Related questions
- Can a traffic officer immobilise a vehicle if the driver tests positive in a breathalyser test?
- In an urban time-limited parking zone requiring a valid parking authorisation, may you park without it?
- The rider of a motorcycle without a protective structure, carrying a pillion passenger...
- Traffic officers immobilise a vehicle when its driver has an alcohol level above the permitted limit. When will the immobilisation be lifted?
- A stop seriously obstructs traffic when...
- Traffic enforcement officers may immobilise a vehicle when...