Correct answer
Yes, among other reasons, because they are often unfamiliar with traffic rules and signs.
Yes. Children may have less experience interpreting rules, judging distances and speeds and anticipating hazards. Their shorter height can mean obstacles such as parked vehicles hide traffic from them and make them harder for drivers to see. Seeing a vehicle does not mean having been seen. Development and knowledge vary: a particular age does not give everyone an identical ability. Take particular care and facilitate safe crossings.
Practice more B licence questions
A 3-minute quick test with exam-style questions. Free, no signup.
All options
Yes, among other reasons, because they are often unfamiliar with traffic rules and signs.
Yes, among other reasons, because their visual field is unlimited and their peripheral vision is greater.
No, children are not a risk group in traffic.
Editorial status: editorially approved. This status does not certify legal review. Report a correction
Keep studying
Related questions
- On a motorcycle whose driver and passenger are required to wear helmets, the passenger rides without one. Who is responsible for that offence under the Traffic Act?
- You are trained to give CPR to an unresponsive adult without trauma who is not breathing normally. You have called 112 and given 30 compressions. Before two mouth-to-mouth breaths, what airway preparation is needed?
- A car overtakes a cyclist outside a built-up area. What is the required minimum lateral clearance?
- What does a beacon signal with a fixed red light indicate?
- By day, after a crash on an interurban road, a car driver gets out and will enter the carriageway or shoulder. Must they wear a high-visibility reflective vest?
- What is the name given to the phenomenon caused by the excessive emission of sulphur compounds?