Correct answer
Yes, unless preserving them would harm casualty or traffic safety.
Yes, unless preserving them would harm casualty or traffic safety. Article 129.2.c requires preserving evidence in these circumstances or when the authorities have been notified, without putting evidence ahead of safety. Do not arbitrarily put every object back or remove harmless parts merely because they are present. Provide or request help and avoid creating another danger.
Practice more B licence questions
A 3-minute quick test with exam-style questions. Free, no signup.
All options
No, put every object back even if useful evidence is destroyed.
Yes, unless preserving them would harm casualty or traffic safety.
No, remove every part even if it creates no danger.
Editorial status: editorially approved. This status does not certify legal review. Report a correction
Keep studying
Related questions
- Under the PAS approach to a crash, what should you do first to intervene without creating another danger?
- Can the driver operate a GPS device while the car is moving?
- What should a driver who is stopped at an intersection controlled by traffic lights and is obstructing the traffic flow do?
- Your lane permits straight ahead or a right turn. The signal shows a circular red light and a green right arrow, and this is the lane needed by right-turning traffic. May you continue straight ahead?
- Before moving sideways, after checking the mirrors, how can you check for a vehicle in the blind spot?
- In a private passenger car with up to nine seats including the driver, may a minor 135 cm tall or shorter occupy the front seat using only the adult seatbelt?