Correct answer
No.
No. The marking separates lanes to guide traffic. Driving along it is allowed only when necessary because of lane width and safe; this rule sets no three-metre threshold. It may be crossed for permitted manoeuvres, such as lane changes, respecting priority and other conditions. This width exception does not authorise driving along a continuous line.
Practice more B licence questions
A 3-minute quick test with exam-style questions. Free, no signup.
All options
Yes, because it is a straight stretch and it is safe.
No.
Yes, because they are discontinuous.
Editorial status: editorially approved. This status does not certify legal review. Report a correction
Share this question
Keep studying
Related questions
- In roadworks, temporary yellow markings define the open lane and old white markings no longer correspond to the open route. Which should you follow?
- Which road-marking category includes the word “STOP” painted on the carriageway, as distinct from the stop line?
- A longitudinal marking formed by two continuous lines placed side by side...
- At a junction, your lane has a selection arrow indicating straight ahead only. You remain in that lane and no instructions change that indication. May you turn left from it?
- What do M-1.9 and M-1.10 broken longitudinal warning markings announce?
- On a one-way urban road that is not a motorway or dual carriageway and has no marked lanes, where should a car normally travel?