Correct answer
Yes, when omitting the audible signal entails no danger to other users.
Yes. They must use the light signal alone when omitting the special audible signal entails no danger to other users. The exception is not based simply on driving in a city. If omitting the audible signal entails danger, both are used. Drivers must always obey officers’ directions and emergency-duty safety conditions.
Practice more B licence questions
A 3-minute quick test with exam-style questions. Free, no signup.
All options
Yes, always in a city even if omitting the audible signal entails danger.
Yes, when omitting the audible signal entails no danger to other users.
No, the light signal alone is prohibited in all circumstances.
Editorial status: editorially approved. This status does not certify legal review. Report a correction
Keep studying
Related questions
- Before a level crossing, two red lights flashing alternately indicate...
- Due to especially serious circumstances and with no alternative means available, a non-priority car performs an emergency service. It has hazard warning lights. How should it try to make other road users aware of that situation?
- When does a police, fire, civil-protection and rescue, or medical-assistance service vehicle have priority status?
- Priority vehicles travelling on urgent service will warn of their presence...
- A priority vehicle is travelling using only its special light signals. Is it compulsory to give way to it?
- An ambulance is on emergency duty using only its special lights. Does it have priority if omitting the audible emergency signal creates no danger to other road users?