Correct answer
The driver who committed the offence.
The driver who committed the offence. Failing that, they fall on the habitual driver or lessee and, in their absence, the owner. The Act provides an exception for duly justified theft or use against the owner’s wishes. These costs differ from a fine and from removal and storage costs under article 105. Rights of appeal and recourse against the responsible person remain available.
Practice more B licence questions
A 3-minute quick test with exam-style questions. Free, no signup.
All options
Nobody, because immobilisation never incurs costs.
The driver who committed the offence.
The traffic officers.
Editorial status: editorially approved. This status does not certify legal review. Report a correction
Share this question
Keep studying
Related questions
- Traffic officers may immobilize a vehicle when its circulation involves:
- Under the Traffic Act, what is a halt (detención)?
- A motor-vehicle driver refuses legally prescribed alcohol tests after an officer requires them. Can the vehicle be immobilised?
- Can a traffic officer immobilise a vehicle if the driver tests positive in a breathalyser test?
- In an urban time-limited parking zone requiring a valid parking authorisation, may you park without it?
- The rider of a motorcycle without a protective structure, carrying a pillion passenger...