Correct answer
Yes.
Yes. Shared use does not remove article 117’s duty. The child sits in the rear, subject to the three statutory exceptions allowing the front seat with an appropriate restraint. Being over 12 does not replace this height-based duty, nor does it depend on a seat already being supplied. A rear-facing front-seat restraint requires the frontal airbag to be disabled. Rear-seat occupancy can justify a seating-location exception, not omission of restraint.
Practice more B licence questions
A 3-minute quick test with exam-style questions. Free, no signup.
All options
Yes.
No.
Only if the vehicle has them.
Editorial status: editorially approved. This status does not certify legal review. Report a correction
Share this question
Keep studying
Glossary terms in this question
Related questions
- If you suffer from depression, you should know that...
- A right-pointing green arrow on a circular black background is lit beside a red light. Turning would join a lane carrying another vehicle. Does the arrow give you priority over it?
- What general message is conveyed when all direction indicators operate together as hazard warning lights?
- Do two transverse broken parallel lines always exclusively identify a cycle crossing?
- With no higher-priority sign or instruction to the contrary, in which situation do animals have priority over vehicles?
- In Spain in 2026, a Spanish-registered passenger car is immobilised by a breakdown on the carriageway. Must the hazard be signalled using the required warning device?