Correct answer
No, travelling very slowly does not authorise that overtaking.
No. Current article 87.1.b prohibits overtaking at and near marked pedestrian crossings. Since 1 October 2026, it no longer includes the former exception based on very low speed. The question concerns a moving passenger car; article 88’s specific conditions for passing immobilised vehicles do not give that general permission. Always respect pedestrian safety and priority.
Practice more B licence questions
A 3-minute quick test with exam-style questions. Free, no signup.
All options
Yes, whenever you travel slowly enough to brake.
Yes, merely seeing no pedestrians at that moment is sufficient.
No, travelling very slowly does not authorise that overtaking.
Editorial status: editorially approved. This status does not certify legal review. Report a correction
Keep studying
Glossary terms in this question
Related questions
- At a crest with restricted visibility on a two-way road, overtaking a passenger car requires entering the opposing direction. Does a broken longitudinal line authorise it?
- On a section where overtaking is prohibited and a U-turn is not expressly authorised, may you reverse your direction of travel?
- On a Spanish autopista, traffic fills the carriageway width and each row can move only at the speed of the vehicle ahead. May the row in the right lane progress faster than the left-lane row?
- In which case does article 54.3 waive the additional gap allowing vehicles behind to overtake you, without removing the safe following-distance requirement?
- Why is it obligatory to look ahead when intending to overtake?
- At a reduced-visibility bend on a two-way carriageway, you intend to overtake by entering the opposing-traffic area or make a U-turn without being able to verify safety. There is no express U-turn authorisation. What is prohibited?