Correct answer
Yes, among other reasons because in the event of a crash they pose an additional danger to the driver and front-seat passenger.
Yes. An unbelted person can be thrown forward in a collision, injuring themselves and striking front occupants. Seat backs do not replace a belt, even at low speed. Use the required belts or restraint systems, including child restraints where applicable, under the relevant rules; legal exemptions do not remove the physical risk of travelling unrestrained.
Practice more B licence questions
A 3-minute quick test with exam-style questions. Free, no signup.
All options
Yes, because the airbags lose their protective effect.
No, because at low speed the backs of the front seats provide sufficient protection against injury.
Yes, among other reasons because in the event of a crash they pose an additional danger to the driver and front-seat passenger.
Editorial status: editorially approved. This status does not certify legal review. Report a correction
Keep studying
Glossary terms in this question
Related questions
- With painkillers or antihistamines it is advisable ...
- When facing an R-400a sign with a white arrow pointing right on a blue background, what must you do?
- You approach a junction controlled only by a STOP sign and a stop line. What must you do?
- For lane counting under the lane-use provisions preceding Article 34, are lanes reserved exclusively for buses or taxis counted?
- A car reaches an ordinary junction without priority signs between two paved roads. A cyclist approaches from its right. With no applicable priority exception, must the driver give way?
- Which effect of ecstasy can impair driving?