Correct answer
No, because it does not obstruct traffic.
The driver of a vehicle immobilised because of a breakdown outside the carriageway and hard shoulder is not required to place the hazard warning device to warn of its presence, because it does not obstruct traffic. When a vehicle is immobilised because of a breakdown on the carriageway or hard shoulder, the obstruction created must be marked to alert other drivers and prevent accidents. A light-emitting hazard warning device must be placed and activated or, alternatively, until 1 January 2026, hazard warning triangles must be placed at an appropriate distance. However, if the vehicle is outside the carriageway and hard shoulder, it does not represent an obstruction to traffic, so the hazard warning device is not required.
Practice more B licence questions
A 3-minute quick test with exam-style questions. Free, no signup.
All options
Yes, because it is an emergency.
No, because it does not obstruct traffic.
Only on roads outside built-up areas with one lane in each direction.
Editorial status: editorially approved. This status does not certify legal review. Report a correction
Keep studying
Glossary terms in this question
Related questions
- If the result of the inspection carried out on your vehicle at an ITV station is unfavourable, may you drive it on public roads?
- What is the service light on works vehicles or tractors like?
- If it issues a warning and receives no response from the driver, what actions does the ADAS “Lane Keeping or LDW” system take?
- Why should we increase the safety distance in fog?
- What do traffic-channelising signs indicate?
- Is reversing along a road prohibited?