Correct answer
The rider or passenger is not wearing a helmet when required.
The rider or passenger fails to wear a helmet when it is compulsory, under Traffic Act Article 104.1.c. It must meet the applicable approval or certification rules and be correctly fastened, subject to regulatory exceptions. Being under 18 alone does not justify immobilisation when the rider has valid authorisation for that vehicle.
Practice more B licence questions
A 3-minute quick test with exam-style questions. Free, no signup.
All options
The rider or passenger is not wearing a helmet when required.
The required helmet is approved and correctly fastened.
A 16-year-old rides a motorcycle permitted by their valid A1 licence.
Editorial status: editorially approved. This status does not certify legal review. Report a correction
Share this question
Keep studying
Related questions
- What is the device called that locks a wheel to physically immobilise a vehicle?
- If the result of the alcohol tests is positive, the officer may immobilise the vehicle, unless…
- What penalty may be imposed on the owner of a vehicle that is driven without insurance?
- A driver commits the offence leading to a vehicle being immobilised by the authority, without theft or use against the owner’s wishes. Under article 104.6, who initially bears the immobilisation costs?
- Traffic officers may immobilize a vehicle when its circulation involves:
- Under the Traffic Act, what is a halt (detención)?